NOSTALGIA, EXPULSION AND THE POETIC I: THE POETICS OF DIASPORA IN THE CORPUS THEOGNIDEUM
Abstract
In the anthology of archaic elegiac poetry called the Corpus Theognideum, the poetic I often eludes traditional approaches to the ‘poetic authority’. Instead of presenting itself as a citizen of a particular ‘city-state’ or at least a prominent member of an elitist circle who came to have a position of authority, the persona loquens situates himself as removed from the community: as impoverished, expelled from his polis, despised, embittered and thirsting for revenge. The purpose of my paper is to consider how the tension between the alienation of the poetic I and the unity of the audience might function during the act of (re)performance. Applying considerations of Edward W Said on ‘diasporic temporality’ to the political and economic conflict between the ideologies of polis and anti-polis in archaic and classical Greece, I show that the poetic I in the Theognidean tradition, by presenting itself as an exile and a victim of the democratic movement, expresses the temporally distant position of the so far privileged aristocracy, situated in dialectical opposition to the democratic institutions of polis.References
Athanassaki, L (Αθανασάκη Λ) 2009. «ἀείδετο πὰν τέμενος. Οι χορικές παραστάσεις και το κοινό τους στην αρχαϊκή και πρώιμη κλασική περίοδο». Ηράκλειο: Πανεπιστημιακές Εκδόσεις Κρήτης.
Bakker, E J 2018. Hesiod in Performance. In Loney & Scully 2018: 143-156.
Bartol, K 2020, Structuring the Genre: The Fifth- and Fourth-Century Authors on Elegy and Elegiac Poets. In Currie & Rutherford 2020: 129-147.
Bowie, E. 2012a. An Early Chapter in the History of the Theognidea. In Riu, X & Pòrtulas, J (eds), Approaches to Archaic Greek Poetry, 121-146. Messina: Dipartimento di scienze dell'antichità.
Bowie, E. L. 2012b. Epinicians and ‘Patrons’. In P Agócs & C Carey & R Rawles (eds), Reading the Victory Ode, 83–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boym, S 2002. The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books.
Brodsky, J 1990. The Condition We Call “Exile”. In J Glad (ed), Literature in Exile, 100-109. Durham – London: Duke University Press.
Budelmann, F 2009a. Introducing Greek Lyric. In Budelmann 2009: 1-18.
Budelmann, F (ed) 2009b. The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric. Cambridge – New York.
Budelmann, F & Power, T 2013. The Inbetweenness of Sympotic Elegy. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 133, 1-19.
Calame, C 1974. Réflexions sur les genres littéraires en Grèce archaïque. QUCC 17, 113-128.
Calame, C 2009. Poetic and Performative Memory in Ancient Greece, translated by Harlan Patton. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.
Cassio, A C (ed.) 1990. Lirica greca e latina. Atti el convegno di studi polacco-italiano Poznań 2-5 maggio 1990. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.
Campbell, G 2016. Anthropology: Knowledge of Man. In Irby, G L (ed), A Companion to Science, Technology, and Medicine in Ancient Greece and Rome, 500-515. Oxford – New York: Wiley Blackwell.
Clay, J C 2003. Hesiod’s Cosmos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cazzato, V & Prodi, E E 2016. Introduction: Continuity in the Sympotic Tradition. In Cazzato, V & Obbink, D & Prodi, E E (eds), The Cup of Song: Studies on Poetry and the Symposion, 1-16. Oxford University Press.
Cerri, G 1990. Il significato di ‘sphregís’ in Teognide e la salvaguardia dell'autenticità testuale nel mondo antico, in: Cassio 1990: 25-43.
Cho, L 2007. The Turn to Diaspora. Topia 17, 11-30.
Compton, T M 2006. Victim of the Muses: Poet as Scapegoat, Warrior and Hero in Greco-Roman and Indo-European Myth and History. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.
Culler, J 2015. Theory of the Lyric, Cambridge. MA – London: Harvard University Press.
Currie, B 2004. Reperformance Scenarios for Pindar’s Odes. In Mackie 2004: 49-69.
Currie, B & Rutherford, I (eds) 2020. The Reception of Greek Lyric Poetry in the Ancient World: Transmission, Canonization and Paratext. Leiden – Boston.
D’Alessio, G B 1994. First-person Problems in Pindar. BICS 39, 117-139.
Dames, N 2010. Nostalgia and its disciplines: A response. Memory Studies 3(3), 269-275.
Edmonds, J M (ed) 1931. Elegy and Iambus, vol. I. Cambridge – London: Cambridge, Mass.: William Heinemann Ltd.
Edmunds, L 1985. The Genre of Theognidean Poetry. In Figueira & Nagy 1985: 101–105.
Edmunds, L 1997. The Seal of Theognis. In Edmunds, L & Wallace R W (eds), Poets, Public and Performance in Ancient Greece, 29-48. Baltimore – London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Edwards, B H 2003. The Practice of Diaspora: Literature, Translation, and the Rise of Black Internationalism, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Figueira, T & Nagy G (eds) 1985. Theognis of Megara. Poetry and the Polis. Baltimore, Md. – London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ford, A 1997. Epic as Genre. In Morris, I & Powell, B (eds). A New Companion to Homer, 396-414. Leiden – New York – Köln: Brill.
Friedländer, P 1913. Hypothekai. II: Theognis. Hermes 58, 572-603.
Gentili, B 1965. Mimnermo. Maia 17, 379–85.
Gentili, B 1990. L’«Io» nella pesia lirica greca. In Cassio 1990: 9-24.
Giangrande, G 1969. Sympotic Literature and Epigram (“L’épigramme grecque: Entretiens sur l'antiquité Classique” 14, 93-177). Vandœuvres, Genève: Fondation Hardt.
Giannini, P 1993. Il proemio, il sigillo e il libro di Teognide. Alcune osservazioni. In Pretagostini, R (ed), Tradizione e innovazione nella cultura greca da Omero all’età ellenistica (Scritti in onore di Bruno Gentili), vol. I, 377-391. Roma: Gruppo Editoriale Internazionale.
González J M 2018. Hesiod’s Rhetoric of Exhortation. In Loney & Scully 2018: 157-174.
Graver, M 1995. Dog-Helen and Homeric Insult. Classical Antiquity 14/1, 41-61.
Graziosi, B 2002. Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Griffin, J 1977. The Epic Cycle and the Uniqueness of Homer. JHS 97, 39-53.
Griffith, M 1983. Personality in Hesiod. Classical Antiquity 2(1), 37-65.
Groningen (van), B A 1960. La composition littéraire archaïque grecque. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.
Groningen (van), B A 1966. Théognis: le premier livre. Édité avec un commentaire. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.
Hammer, D 2004. Ideology, the Symposium, and Archaic Politics. The American Journal of Philology 125(4), 479-512.
Herman, G 1987. Ritualised Friendship and the Greek City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hobden, F 2013. The Symposion in Ancient Greek Society and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hose, M 2016. Places of Production. In Hose & Schenker 2016: 325-343.
Hose, M & Schenker D (eds) 2016. A Companion to Greek Literature. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hubbard, T K 2004. The Dissemination of Epinician Lyric: Pan-Hellenism, Reperformance, Written Texts. In Mackie 2004: 71-93.
Hudson-Williams, T 1910. The Elegies of Theognis and Other Elegies Included in the Theognidean Sylloge. A revised text based on a new collation of the Mutinensis Ms. with introduction, commentary and appendices. London: G. Bell and Sons.
Hunter, R. & Rutherford, I 2009. Introduction. In Hunter, R & Rutherford, I (eds), Wandering Poets in Ancient Greek Culture: Travel, Locality and Pan-Hellenism, 1-22. Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press.
Immisch, O 1933. Die Sphragis des Theognis, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 82, 298-304.
Janko, R 1994. The Iliad: A Commentary: Volume 4, Books 13-16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kampakoglou, A 2019. Studies in the Reception of Pindar in Ptolemaic Poetry. Berlin – Boston: De Gruyter.
Karageorgos, G K (Καραγεώργος, Γ Κ) 2017. «Η έννοια της αρετής ως παιδευτικό ιδεώδες στα ποιήματα του Θέογνη. Αθήνα: Εκδοτικός Οίκος Α. Α. Λιβάνη.
Kirk, G S 1985. The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kurke, L 1990. Pindar’s Sixth Pythian and the Tradition of Advice Poetry. TAPA 120, 85-107.
Kurke, L 1994. Crisis and Decorum in Sixth-Century Lesbos: Reading Alkaios Otherwise. QUCC 47(2), 67-92.
Kurke, L 1997. Inventing the “Hetaira”: Sex, Politics, and Discursive Conflict in Archaic Greece. Classical Antiquity 16(1), 106-150.
Kurke, L 1999. Coins, Bodies, Games and Gold: The Politics of Meaning in Archaic Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kurke, L 2013. The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy. Berkeley: California Classical Studies.
Lardinois, A 2020. New Philology and the Classics: Accounting for Variation in the Textual Transmission of Greek Lyric and Elegiac Poetry. In Currie & Rutherford 2020: 39-71.
Lefkowitz, M R 1978. The Poet as Hero: Fifth-Century Autobiography and Subsequent Biographical Fiction. The Classical Quarterly 28(2), 459-461.
Lefkowitz, M R 2012. The Lives of the Greek Poets (Second Edition). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Loney, A C & Scully, S. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Hesiod. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackie, C J (ed) 2004. Oral performance and its context. Leiden: Brill.
Martin, R 1989. The Language of Heroes. Speech and Performance in the Illiad. Ithaca – London: Cornell University Press.
Martin, R 1998. The Seven Sages as Performers of Wisdom, In Dougherty, C & Kurke, L (eds), Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece: Cult, Performance, Politics. 108-130. New York: Oxford University Press.
Miralles, C 1996. Poeta, saggio, sofista, filosofo: l'intellettuale nella Grecia antica. In Settis, C (ed.), Greci. Storia cultura arte società, I. Noi e i Greci, 849-883. Torino: Einaudi.
Morris, I 1987. Burial and Ancient Society: The Rise of the Greek City-State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morris, I 1996. The Strong Principle of Equality and the Archaic Origins of Greek Democracy. In Ober, I & Hedrick, C (eds), Dêmokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern, 19-48. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Morris, I 2000. Archeology as Cultural History: Words and Things in Iron Age Greece. Oxford: Blackwell.
Murray, R D Jr. 1965. Theognis 341-50. TAPhA 96, 227-281.
Nagy, G 1985. Theognis and Megara: A Poet's Vision of His City. In Figueira & Nagy 1985: 22-81.
Nagy, G 1994. Genre and Occasion. Mètis: Anthropologie des mondes grecs anciens 9-10, 11-25.
Nagy, G 1996. Poetry as performance: Homer and beyond. Cambridge – New York.
Nagy, G 2009. Hesiod and the Ancient Biographical Traditions. In Montanari, F & Rengakos, A & Tsagalis, Ch (eds), Brill's Companion to Hesiod, 271–311. Leiden – Boston: Brill.
Napolitano, M 1996. Del bere sangue e di Teognide cane (a proposito di Theogn. 341-350). Eikasmos 7, 65-79.
Nobili, C 2016. Choral Elegy: The Tyranny of the Handbook. In Swift, L & Carey, C (eds), Elegy and Iambus. New approaches, 33-55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parry, M 1971. The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry, Parry, M (ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pelliccia, H 2009. Simonides, Pindar and Bacchylides. In Budelmann 2009b: 240–61.
Perisinakis, I N (Περυσινάκης, Ι Ν) 2015. «Αρχαϊκή λυρική ποίηση. Ηθικές αξίες και πολιτική συμπεριφορά στην αρχαία ελληνική λογοτεχνία: Προβλήματα ερμηνείας και μετάφρασης της αρχαϊκής ελληνικής λογοτεχνίας: Μια ερμηνευτική προσέγγιση». Αθήνα: Εκδόσεις Δημ. Ν. Παπαδήμα.
Reitzenstein, R 1893. Epigramm und Skolion. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der alexandrinischen Dichtung. Giessen: J. Ricker.
Roisman, J 1984-1986. The Image of the Political Exile in Archaic Greece. Ancient Society 15/17, 23-32.
Rossi, L E 1971. I generi letterari e le loro leggi scritte e non scritte nelle letterature classiche. BICS 18, 69-94.
Rösler, W 1980. Dichter und Gruppe: eine Untersuchung zu den Bedingungen und zur historischen Funktion früher griechischer Lyrik am Beispiel Alkaios. München: Fink.
Said, E W 2000. Reflections on Exile and Other Essays. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Schenker, D 2016. Sponsors and Enemies of Literature. In Hose & Schenker 2016: 310-321.
Schmitt Pantel, P 1992. La cité au banquet. Histoire des repas publics dans les cités grecques. Rome: Ecole française de Rome.
Scodel, R 1990. Bardic Performance and Oral Tradition in Homer. AJPh 119(2), 171-194.
Selle, H 2008. Theognis und die Theognidea. Berlin – New York.
Sigelman, A C 2016. Pindar’s Poetics of Immortality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slings, S R 2000. Symposion and Interpretation: Elegy as group-song and the so-called awakening individual. Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 40, 423-434.
Spelman, H 2018. Pindar and the Poetics of Permanence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stamatopoulou, Z 2017. Hesiod and Classical Greek Poetry: Reception and Transformation in the Fifth Century BCE. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Starr, C G 1992. The Aristocratic Temper of Greek Civilization. New York– Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steiner, D 2015. “Wolf’s Justice”: The Iliadic Doloneia and the Semiotics of Wolves. Classical Antiquity 34(2), 335-369.
Stoddard, K 2004. The narrative voice in the Theogony of Hesiod. Leiden: Brill.
Tsagarakis, O 1977. Self-expression in Early Greek Lyric elegiac and iambic poetry. Wiesbaden: Steiner.
Walsh, G 1984. The Varieties of Enchantment: Early Creek Views of the Nature and Function of Poetry. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Vivante, P 1985. On Homer’s Winged Words. The Classical Quarterly. New Series 25/1, 1-12.
Young, D (ed.) 1961. Theognis. Ps.-Pythagoras. Ps.-Phocylides. Chares. Anonymi Aulodia. Fragmentum teliambicum. Lipsiae: Teubner.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (BY-NC-ND 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
