Grant Parker


In the sociology of literature over the ages, patronage is undoubtedly one of the most
pervasive themes.! The late 1st century AD presents no exception. Though the early
Empire lacked a patron having the renown of Maecenas (d. 8 BC), it is nonetheless
eminently worthy of study in this regard in view of two contemporary writers - Martial
(AD 40- c.103) and Statius (c.45- c.96). Despite manifest differences in style and
temperament between these poets, both can be described as occasional poets (i.e. poets
composing for specific social occasions) and this fact alone renders patronage highly
Concentrating therefore on that period, I wish here to examine the phenomenon of literary
patronage within the context of Roman mores. Broadly speaking, patronage of letters must
be situated in the characteristically Roman system of patron-client relations. Topics to be
discussed include its terminology and mechanics, origins, its purpose and value - material
or otherwise - and the poet's economic position in society, and finally its continuity over
Roman history. This study is undertaken in the form of a survey of some of the more
important critical literature on the subject to have appeared in recent times, but i hope it
can serve at the same time as a general introduction to the subject.

Full Text:




  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISSN 2079-2883 (online); ISSN 0303-1896 (print)

Powered by OJS and hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2011.


This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.

SUNJournals Help