Polymetic Heroism in the Apologue
Abstract
In the Homeric Apologue, success is garnered by acts of trickery which help the hero overcome foes/surpass obstacles, while victims of tricks are depicted in helpless, supplicative, soporific, or weakened states. In tandem with this, I observe how the absence of polymetic prowess, demonstrated either through a focus on isolated bie (physical strength) or through what is otherwise represented as a certain mindlessness or foolishness, leads to failure in the interactions. The Apologue has the important function in the Odyssey of solidifying Odysseus’ outstanding quality as a polymetic hero, acting as a proving ground for this means of heroic achievement.References
Adkins, A.W.H. (1972), Moral values and political behaviour in ancient Greece. Ann Arbor: Chatto and Windus.
Allan, W. (2006), Divine justice and cosmic order in early Greek epic, JHS 126: 1-35.
Austin, N. (1975), Archery at the dark of the moon: poetic problems in Homer’s Odyssey. Berkeley: University of California Press.
---(1983), Odysseus and the cyclops: Who is who?, in C.A. Rubino and
C.W. Shelmerdine (eds.), Approaches to Homer. Austin: University of Texas Press, 3-37.
Barnouw, J. (2004), Odysseus, hero of practical intelligence: Deliberations and signs in Homer’s Odyssey. Lanham: University Press of America,® Inc.
Berdowski, P. (2008), Heroes and fish in Homer, Palamedes: A Journal of Ancient History 3: 75-91.
Bergren, A. (1983), Odyssean temporality: Many (re)turns, in C.A. Rubino and C.W. Shelmerdine (eds.), Approaches to Homer. Austin: University of Texas Press, 38-73.
---(2008), Weaving truth: Essays on language and the female in Greek thought. Washington D.C.: HUP.
Clay, J.S. (1983), The wrath of Athena: Gods and men in the Odyssey. Princeton: PUP.
Cook, E.F. (1995), The Odyssey in Athens: Myths of cultural origins. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
---(1999), ‘Active’ and ‘passive” heroics in the ‘Odyssey’, CW 93 (2): 149-167.
De Jong, I.J.F. (2004, 2nd ed.), A narratological commentary on the
Odyssey. Cambridge: CUP.
Detienne, M & Vernant, J.P. (1974), Les ruses de l’intelligence: La mètis des Grecs. Paris: Flammarion.
Dimock, G.E. (1956), The name of Odysseus, The Hudson Review 9 (1): 52-70.
Doherty, L.E. (2008), Nausikaa and Tyro: Idylls of courtship in the Phaiakian episode of the Odyssey and the Hesiodic catalogue of women, Phoenix 62 (1/2): 63-76.
Dougherty, C. (2001), The raft of Odysseus: The ethnographic imagination of Homer’s Odyssey. Oxford: OUP.
Dunkle, R. (1987), Nestor, Odysseus, and the MÊTIS: BIÊ antithesis: The funeral games, Iliad 23, CW 81 (1): 1-17.
Felson-Rubin, N. (1996), Penelope’s perspective: Character from plot, in S.L. Schein (ed.), Reading the Odyssey: Selected interpretative essays. Princeton: PUP, 163-183.
Finkelberg, M. (1995), Odysseus and the genus ‘hero’, G&R 42 (1): 1-14.
Frame, D. (1978), The myth of return in early Greek epic. New Haven: YUP.
Fredricksmeyer, H.C. (1997), Penelope ‘polutropos:’ The crux at Odyssey 23.218-24, AJP 118 (4): 487-497.
Friedrich, R. (1991), The hybris of Odysseus, JHS 111: 16-28.
Gagarin, M. (1987), Morality in Homer, CP 82 (4): 285-306.
Gould, J. (1973), Hiketeia, JHS 93: 74-103.
Griffin, J. (1980), Homer. Oxford: OUP.
Harsh, P.W. (1950), Penelope and Odysseus in Odyssey XIX, AJP 71 (1): 1-21.
Heatherington, M.E. (1976), Chaos, order, and cunning in the ‘Odyssey’, SP 73 (3): 225-238.
Heubeck, A & Hoekstra, A. (1989), A commentary on Homer’s Odyssey: Volume II: Books IX-XVI. Oxford: OUP.
Hopman, M. (2012), Narrative and rhetoric in Odysseus’ tale to the Phaeacians, AJP 133 (1): 1-30.
Lexikon des frühgriechischen Epos. (1955, 1991, 2004, 2006). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Magrath, W.T. (1982), Progression of the lion simile in the ‘Odyssey’, CJ 77 (3): 205-212.
Most, G.W. (1989), The structure and function of Odysseus’ Apologoi, TAPA 119: 15-30.
Murnaghan, S. (1995), The plan of Athena, in B. Cohen (ed.), The distaff side: Representing the female in Homer’s Odyssey. New York: OUP, 61-80.
Nagler, M.N. (1990), The proem and the problem, ClAnt 9 (2): 335-356.
---(1996), Dread goddess revisited, in S.L. Schein (ed.), Reading the Odyssey: Selected interpretative essays. Princeton: PUP, 141-161.
Nagy, G. (1979), The best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the hero in archaic Greek poetry. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Niles, J.D. (1978), Patterning in the wanderings of Odysseus, Ramus 7 (1): 46-60.
Olson, S.D. (1989), Odyssey 8: Guile, force and the subversive poetics of desire, Arethusa 22 (2): 135-145.
Pelliccia, H. (1995), Mind, body, and speech in Homer and Pindar. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Podlecki, A.J. (1961), Guest-gifts and nobodies in ‘Odyssey 9’, Phoenix 15 (3): 125-133.
Pucci, P. (1987), Odysseus polutropos: Intertextual readings in the Odyssey and the Iliad. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
---(1998), The song of the Sirens: Essays on Homer. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, INC.
Reece, S. (1993), The stranger’s welcome: Oral theory and the aesthetics of the Homeric hospitality scene. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Reinhardt, K. (1996 [1960]), The adventures in the Odyssey, in S.L. Schein (ed.), Reading the Odyssey: Selected interpretative essays. Princeton: PUP, 63-132.
Roisman, J. (1982), Some social conventions and deviations in Homeric society, Aclass 25: 35-41.
Sacks, R. (1987), The traditional phrase in Homer. Leiden: Brill.
Schein, S. (1970), Odysseus and Polyphemus in the Odyssey, GRBS 11 (2): 73-83.
---(1995), Female representations and interpreting the Odyssey, in B. Cohen (ed.), The distaff side: Representing the female in Homer’s Odyssey. New York: OUP, 17-27.
---(1996), Introduction, in S.L. Schein (ed.), Reading the Odyssey: Selected interpretative essays. Princeton: PUP, 3-31.
Scott, M. (1979), Pity and pathos in Homer, AClass 22: 1-14.
Scott, W.C. (1974), The oral nature of the Homeric simile. Leiden: Brill.
Segal, C. (1962), The Phaeacians and the symbolism of Odysseus’ return, Arion 1 (4): 17-64.
---(1983), Kleos and its ironies in the Odyssey, AC 52: 22-47.
Shewring, W. (1980), Homer: the Odyssey. Oxford: OUP.
Simpson, M. (1972), ‘Odyssey 9’: Symmetry and paradox in outis, CJ 68 (1): 22-25.
Sluiter, I. (2014), Fish similes and converging story lines in the Odyssey, CQ 64 (2): 821-824.
Thornton, A. (1984), Homer’s Iliad: Its composition and the motif of supplication. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Van Nortwick, T. (2009), The unknown Odysseus: Alternate worlds in
Homer’s Odyssey. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Weinberg, F.M. (1986), The cave: The evolution of a metaphoric field from Homer to Ariosto. New York: Peter Lang.
Wilson, D.F. (2002), Ransom, revenge, and heroic identity in the Iliad. Cambridge: CUP.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (BY-NC-ND 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
